WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:11.920
Music.

00:00:12.768 --> 00:00:17.268
Hello, welcome to TV Plus Talk. I know we've hardly been away,

00:00:17.428 --> 00:00:19.268
but we like doing more of this.

00:00:19.388 --> 00:00:21.828
There's so much to talk about as well. So hello, Chuck Joyner.

00:00:22.288 --> 00:00:25.748
Hello, Charlotte Henry. Good to see you. And you're right. It seems like Apple

00:00:25.748 --> 00:00:27.368
TV Plus is in the news more and more.

00:00:28.928 --> 00:00:33.248
Yeah, there really is a lot going on. And I actually think this is quite a big

00:00:33.248 --> 00:00:36.888
story, the one we want to start with and dive straight into,

00:00:37.128 --> 00:00:41.148
which is that I mean, various outlets have reported that I'm looking at a story

00:00:41.148 --> 00:00:45.748
from PCMag, but there's lots of reports of this, that you're going to be able

00:00:45.748 --> 00:00:49.388
to buy a TV Plus subscription by a Prime Video.

00:00:50.848 --> 00:00:56.248
That's rather interesting, I think. I agree. I agree. And I feel like this is

00:00:56.248 --> 00:00:58.588
a win for everyone involved.

00:00:59.828 --> 00:01:08.328
Okay. Go on. Okay. I think it's a win for Apple because they get access to yet another platform.

00:01:08.948 --> 00:01:14.888
I think it's a win for Amazon because they get one more item they can offer

00:01:14.888 --> 00:01:20.928
as part of their platform, even though you can argue that in some ways maybe the two compete.

00:01:22.768 --> 00:01:28.228
It's amazon prime is such a weird animal anyway that yeah there there's there's

00:01:28.228 --> 00:01:32.328
a venn diagram somewhere of the overlap of competition but it's not a 100 overlap

00:01:32.328 --> 00:01:35.948
and i think the the users and

00:01:36.188 --> 00:01:42.008
uh the end user benefits because now if they they don't necessarily have to

00:01:42.008 --> 00:01:48.208
have an apple tv plus to access uh excuse me and they don't have to have an

00:01:48.208 --> 00:01:53.648
apple tv to access apple tv plus if they already have a Fire TV device.

00:01:54.388 --> 00:02:02.628
And frankly, the Fire TV devices are pretty darn inexpensive and they're not bad. I have one.

00:02:02.808 --> 00:02:09.288
Now, I don't have it as my primary TV, but I have it as a secondary TV and it is just fine.

00:02:09.448 --> 00:02:13.668
So if you're one of those people who wants to lean back in the living room with

00:02:13.668 --> 00:02:19.748
the big surround sound system and everything, I can't comment on the quality of that size TV.

00:02:19.748 --> 00:02:25.008
But for a secondary TV in a bedroom or rec room or whatever, it's just fine.

00:02:25.288 --> 00:02:31.288
So this just opens up everything without the necessity of that additional hardware investment.

00:02:32.816 --> 00:02:38.116
So I agree with 70% to 80% of what you just said. All right.

00:02:38.676 --> 00:02:45.076
So I think it's great for the users because it's just not another app you have

00:02:45.076 --> 00:02:47.356
to download, not another app you have to fire up.

00:02:47.496 --> 00:02:53.956
You can be browsing in your Amazon Prime Video app, and you can jump between

00:02:53.956 --> 00:02:58.536
Prime Video, TV+, maybe you subscribe to Paramount+. there.

00:02:58.736 --> 00:03:02.996
You can jump around all in one home, which is, of course, what Amazon wants you to do.

00:03:04.036 --> 00:03:08.176
So I think it's great for the consumer for the same reasons I think it's great

00:03:08.176 --> 00:03:11.536
for Amazon, because it's another reason to have the Prime Video app.

00:03:11.676 --> 00:03:13.416
It's another reason to use it.

00:03:13.976 --> 00:03:18.236
And it might keep you in that app longer. I think it's a bit of a surrender

00:03:18.236 --> 00:03:24.156
from Apple, actually, because we know that Apple wanted its TV app, not its service.

00:03:24.336 --> 00:03:28.296
We're going to do that thing where we talk about three different things with the same name.

00:03:29.196 --> 00:03:34.996
We know that Apple wanted its TV app to compete with the Prime Video app and

00:03:34.996 --> 00:03:39.676
also be a place where you could subscribe to lots of different things and have

00:03:39.676 --> 00:03:43.756
different channels within the TV app, also the TV box, same thing.

00:03:44.816 --> 00:03:51.176
And so I'm amazed it's giving its proprietary service to such a clear rival.

00:03:51.776 --> 00:03:54.896
And clearly it feels that that is a crucial way

00:03:54.896 --> 00:03:57.576
to build numbers and I as I

00:03:57.576 --> 00:04:01.636
say I you know maybe slightly overstating the case but I don't think too much

00:04:01.636 --> 00:04:07.176
it feels like a little bit of a surrender to me that it's handing over its you

00:04:07.176 --> 00:04:11.656
know entry to its product to a rival now of course Apple say yeah but we get

00:04:11.656 --> 00:04:16.136
a cut of the money it gets our content in front of more people blah blah blah And all that,

00:04:16.316 --> 00:04:18.536
you know, that is all true, of course.

00:04:18.756 --> 00:04:22.056
And that's a perfectly valid reasons for doing this deal.

00:04:22.516 --> 00:04:28.336
I'm just slightly shocked, given that we know how Apple loves to control all

00:04:28.336 --> 00:04:31.736
its ecosystems and how we interact with its products.

00:04:32.176 --> 00:04:35.336
I'm amazed that it's allowed this to happen.

00:04:35.756 --> 00:04:40.576
So it's going to cost $9.99 a month. I'm not sure if it's happening in the UK,

00:04:40.576 --> 00:04:43.096
actually, but it's $9.99 a month.

00:04:43.856 --> 00:04:49.056
An interesting thing is so i don't know if you do this chuck i access tv plus

00:04:49.056 --> 00:04:54.456
through an apple one bundle um i have the top tier apple one bundle because

00:04:54.456 --> 00:04:58.356
i want the memory it offers i want news plus i like fitness plus so i've got

00:04:58.356 --> 00:05:03.376
it as part of that bundle uh obviously you cannot access a bundle,

00:05:03.996 --> 00:05:10.156
if you're buying tv plus through prime video obviously uh so that's one incentive

00:05:10.156 --> 00:05:12.796
to stay within the Apple ecosystem. But beyond that...

00:05:14.905 --> 00:05:19.345
I'm not sure. And interestingly, it looks like the baseball as well will be

00:05:19.345 --> 00:05:23.165
available as part of this prime video move.

00:05:23.585 --> 00:05:31.365
So, you know, premium sports content that it spent serious money on is all going

00:05:31.365 --> 00:05:34.805
to be not in an Apple ecosystem. I'm quite shocked, to be honest.

00:05:35.825 --> 00:05:39.165
Okay, I agree with 75 to 80% of what you said.

00:05:40.605 --> 00:05:47.025
So let me push back on it. The simple fact is that Apple TV plus subscriptions

00:05:47.025 --> 00:05:50.605
have not been what we would like to see them and what Apple would like to see them.

00:05:51.505 --> 00:05:57.745
So I look at this and say, all right, if I can, if this is a way to get Apple

00:05:57.745 --> 00:06:02.925
TV plus content in front of more people, that's a good thing.

00:06:03.085 --> 00:06:08.645
Because at some point, you know, people are, we're hearing about it already.

00:06:08.645 --> 00:06:13.585
People are re-evaluating and re-evaluating and re-re-evaluating their subscriptions.

00:06:14.305 --> 00:06:25.345
If I find myself going to Prime and principally using the Apple TV Plus service for the great content,

00:06:25.625 --> 00:06:32.105
I may have to think about cutting Prime and going to the content and going to

00:06:32.105 --> 00:06:33.485
Apple TV Plus for the content.

00:06:34.685 --> 00:06:38.985
Now the reason this is such a difficult comparison is

00:06:38.985 --> 00:06:41.965
kind of obvious because yes you can subscribe to prime

00:06:41.965 --> 00:06:44.745
as a thing but really

00:06:44.745 --> 00:06:47.585
the reason you subscribe to prime well that's not fair the reason

00:06:47.585 --> 00:06:51.265
i subscribe to prime is for the second day deliveries i

00:06:51.265 --> 00:06:54.285
i think it is fair because i think that

00:06:54.285 --> 00:06:57.325
you know people most people use prime to

00:06:57.325 --> 00:07:01.385
get the next day delivery and the tv

00:07:01.385 --> 00:07:04.685
stuff most of the time is a nice add-on right and

00:07:04.685 --> 00:07:07.425
look i again i'm familiar with the prime

00:07:07.425 --> 00:07:11.365
that's a bit to be fair because there are very big season uh you know series

00:07:11.365 --> 00:07:15.045
that prime video shows i'm thinking of reacher there's obviously big sporting

00:07:15.045 --> 00:07:21.085
events that it has both here and abroad but as a general thing most people's

00:07:21.085 --> 00:07:26.105
gateway to prime video is next day delivery absolutely absolutely and look i'm

00:07:26.105 --> 00:07:27.265
familiar with Prime content.

00:07:27.705 --> 00:07:34.785
And so, yes, things like Reacher, The Boys, there are some really great shows on there.

00:07:35.185 --> 00:07:41.325
As a percentage, though, of what I would be interested in watching,

00:07:41.645 --> 00:07:43.885
it's a reasonably low percentage.

00:07:44.545 --> 00:07:51.825
And so that's where the Apple TV+, I think, ends up being more of a draw for that.

00:07:52.005 --> 00:07:57.745
Now, and look, in some ways, I might say to you that If Apple TV Plus can get

00:07:57.745 --> 00:08:00.605
the full price indirectly, great.

00:08:01.005 --> 00:08:09.325
But is it better to net a little bit less and get more eyeballs and use that

00:08:09.325 --> 00:08:12.745
to continue to fund your programming and fund your platform?

00:08:14.542 --> 00:08:17.402
Here's one do you think they'll ever do a thing where

00:08:17.402 --> 00:08:20.662
you have to ask there'll be some content that's exclusive to

00:08:20.662 --> 00:08:26.942
the apple tv app i would be would not be surprised at all if they did that i

00:08:26.942 --> 00:08:30.302
think that yeah we don't know the details of the deal but well and that's a

00:08:30.302 --> 00:08:35.942
dangerous game to play because then you know do you risk invoking the ire of

00:08:35.942 --> 00:08:38.102
the people who subscribe to it through prime,

00:08:38.782 --> 00:08:43.742
and then are looking for that, you know, the Charlotte Henry show on Apple TV Plus.

00:08:44.002 --> 00:08:46.802
Oh, no, we're sorry. That's exclusive. That's a terrifying prospect.

00:08:47.482 --> 00:08:48.982
No, I kind of like it, actually.

00:08:49.922 --> 00:08:52.682
You know, that's a dangerous game to play.

00:08:53.922 --> 00:09:00.462
Yeah. Here's what Eddie Q, SVP of services, he put, Amazon put out a press release,

00:09:00.482 --> 00:09:02.102
and this was Eddie Q's comment in it.

00:09:02.482 --> 00:09:05.562
He said, sorry, let's just unpack that sentence.

00:09:06.142 --> 00:09:10.762
Amazon put out a press release, and here is Eddie Q's comment in it.

00:09:12.302 --> 00:09:15.382
Sorry, that's quite a big deal, no? Yeah, that is a big deal.

00:09:15.582 --> 00:09:16.742
That is a big deal. Right.

00:09:17.162 --> 00:09:19.982
Anyway, here's what Eddie Q said in an Amazon press release.

00:09:20.282 --> 00:09:24.522
We want to make Apple TV Plus and its award-winning library of series and films

00:09:24.522 --> 00:09:28.602
from the world's greatest storytellers available to as many viewers as possible.

00:09:29.062 --> 00:09:32.562
We're thrilled that Prime Video will now offer Apple TV Plus,

00:09:32.562 --> 00:09:35.882
giving viewers an incredible breadth of viewing options.

00:09:37.813 --> 00:09:46.413
There you go. So isn't that an interesting way of promoting Apple without ever

00:09:46.413 --> 00:09:48.113
necessarily mentioning the competition?

00:09:49.813 --> 00:09:55.453
Oh, yeah, it's the most Apple comment ever. Yeah. It's like a classic Eddie Q quote.

00:09:56.533 --> 00:10:00.713
Charlotte, one other angle. I'm anxious to see what your take on this would be.

00:10:03.353 --> 00:10:06.293
I'm trying to figure out how to say it. so if

00:10:06.293 --> 00:10:11.773
apple tv plus is on amazon well where's

00:10:11.773 --> 00:10:14.693
the downside to it i mean is is

00:10:14.693 --> 00:10:17.953
other than other than you you saying it's

00:10:17.953 --> 00:10:20.953
potentially a bit of a surrender where's the

00:10:20.953 --> 00:10:23.733
downside there's no downside for

00:10:23.733 --> 00:10:27.073
consumers okay good the

00:10:27.073 --> 00:10:29.893
downside to consumers is you can't get a bundle but i'm guessing if

00:10:29.893 --> 00:10:33.053
you're interested if you care enough to get only tv

00:10:33.053 --> 00:10:36.793
plus in prime video you don't care about a bundle so fine

00:10:36.793 --> 00:10:39.733
you're making an active decision that you don't want to bundle you

00:10:39.733 --> 00:10:42.513
just want tv plus so there's no

00:10:42.513 --> 00:10:45.453
downside to that kind of consumer because the pricing

00:10:45.453 --> 00:10:48.273
is the same right you know so there's there's no

00:10:48.273 --> 00:10:54.013
downside to you know to that uh there's absolutely no downside to amazon as

00:10:54.013 --> 00:10:59.793
i said because it's another reason to use its ecosystem i think apple allowing

00:10:59.793 --> 00:11:07.573
people out of its own ecosystem is a very un-Apple thing to do and it's a downside for them.

00:11:08.653 --> 00:11:14.913
Unless, of course, everyone decides Prime Video is horrible and they want to head back to the TV app.

00:11:15.973 --> 00:11:19.813
So I'm going to have to go back and check. Maybe I'm wrong.

00:11:19.973 --> 00:11:26.253
So it'll be interesting to see how Prime Video, excuse me, how Apple TV Plus

00:11:26.253 --> 00:11:29.233
content becomes available on Prime Video.

00:11:30.161 --> 00:11:34.041
Oh, I know the answer to that. Okay, good. I mean, what will the interface look

00:11:34.041 --> 00:11:36.521
like is where I'm going with this. So it's called a channel.

00:11:36.721 --> 00:11:41.641
I subscribe to something, another outlet through Amazon Prime Video, and it's a channel.

00:11:41.781 --> 00:11:45.941
So you can jump between your different channels in the Prime Video app.

00:11:45.981 --> 00:11:51.481
So you would press, I assume, the TV Plus logo, and it will take you into the world of TV Plus.

00:11:51.781 --> 00:11:55.421
And they're all kind of standard fare. I'm sure there'll be some design that

00:11:55.421 --> 00:11:58.521
shows you it's Apple. But it's a pretty straightforward thing to do.

00:11:59.341 --> 00:12:02.101
Yeah well i guess where i was going with that i'm more

00:12:02.101 --> 00:12:05.201
interested in will the once you're

00:12:05.201 --> 00:12:08.121
once you've clicked that button will you be

00:12:08.121 --> 00:12:11.541
into a more apple like interface for tv

00:12:11.541 --> 00:12:16.661
plus talk or will you be in the what seems to have become sort of the more standard

00:12:16.661 --> 00:12:22.501
prime interfaces and that's really not fair because every app has its own its

00:12:22.501 --> 00:12:28.721
own kind of interface well this is the thing i think It all has an Amazon-y look.

00:12:28.921 --> 00:12:34.821
I'm just actually firing up my Prime video now just to take a look at one of the channels I have.

00:12:36.281 --> 00:12:42.801
But it does tend to, you know, sort of be pretty Amazon-y, which is why,

00:12:42.941 --> 00:12:46.241
again, I'm somewhat surprised that Apple allowed to do this.

00:12:46.561 --> 00:12:48.361
I'm sure there must have been some.

00:12:48.801 --> 00:12:52.781
I'm intrigued to see it for all the reasons you're saying. because I'd be amazed

00:12:52.781 --> 00:12:56.801
if there isn't some, you know, design compromise.

00:12:57.641 --> 00:13:03.761
You never quite know. No. And the other thing that I think is interesting,

00:13:03.921 --> 00:13:09.181
you know, we've had a lot of discussions on my show about what seemed to be

00:13:09.181 --> 00:13:14.261
sometimes maybe a little bit of a sweetheart deal between Amazon and Apple where

00:13:14.261 --> 00:13:20.581
I can order things on the Amazon app and I'm not paying a 30% cut.

00:13:21.461 --> 00:13:24.741
And, you know, people have questioned that. And it's like, look,

00:13:24.861 --> 00:13:26.201
this is just the way the world works.

00:13:26.421 --> 00:13:31.801
You know, big companies make sweetheart deals between each other because it benefits both of them.

00:13:32.041 --> 00:13:37.421
So is it possible that this is a quid pro quo and Amazon will take a little

00:13:37.421 --> 00:13:39.701
or no cut of the Apple TV plus fees?

00:13:41.001 --> 00:13:46.901
I can't imagine that. I've just loaded up one of the channels I subscribe to

00:13:46.901 --> 00:13:48.861
and it looks pretty Amazon-y.

00:13:50.669 --> 00:13:58.189
Okay. I admit, are you doing it on your computer or on your TV? Correct.

00:13:58.669 --> 00:14:02.589
Okay. So I've got to go and see what it looks like on my TV,

00:14:02.649 --> 00:14:04.289
and that's in the other room, so I can't do it here.

00:14:05.429 --> 00:14:08.989
But I think it's a great point you're making about the design,

00:14:09.129 --> 00:14:15.849
because you and I have covered Apple more than enough to know how neurotic it

00:14:15.849 --> 00:14:19.389
is about how it presents anything that it's associated with.

00:14:19.389 --> 00:14:22.569
Um and so i i

00:14:22.569 --> 00:14:25.629
entirely agree with what you're saying that it's a it's will

00:14:25.629 --> 00:14:28.849
be fascinating to see how it looks

00:14:28.849 --> 00:14:32.229
within the amazon ecosystem and

00:14:32.229 --> 00:14:35.429
if you think about it apple tv the app

00:14:35.429 --> 00:14:38.329
does offer this service as well and you know

00:14:38.329 --> 00:14:41.289
that all looks pretty appley for want

00:14:41.289 --> 00:14:44.069
of a better phrase and so i i can't imagine

00:14:44.069 --> 00:14:47.189
there's going to be major concessions if you look interestingly

00:14:47.189 --> 00:14:53.189
actually within amazon there's a james bond because it owns mgm there's a james

00:14:53.189 --> 00:14:58.569
bond world within prime video now and that's got a slight designer you know

00:14:58.569 --> 00:15:03.529
tweak on it but basically it has its standard viewing right and its standard

00:15:03.529 --> 00:15:06.569
presentation so i can't see that can be huge deviation,

00:15:08.169 --> 00:15:15.889
um are you familiar with pluto tv no not really okay because i'm trying to think of the pluto tv.

00:15:17.689 --> 00:15:22.769
Interfaces and the 2B interfaces and some of the other channels that I've dipped in and out.

00:15:23.089 --> 00:15:28.389
And they're, I mean, look, at some point, you know, short of introducing just

00:15:28.389 --> 00:15:33.989
a lot of bandwidth-heavy graphics, there are only so many ways you can present

00:15:33.989 --> 00:15:37.509
a grid of content for consumption.

00:15:38.149 --> 00:15:42.189
That said, though, each one of those has, like you said with the James Bond

00:15:42.189 --> 00:15:43.789
world, their own little tweaks.

00:15:44.809 --> 00:15:51.169
So how much control will Amazon give Apple? How much control does Apple want?

00:15:52.406 --> 00:15:54.746
And what difference will it actually make? But we know the answer to the second

00:15:54.746 --> 00:15:59.646
part. Well, yeah, that's a good point. But how much difference will it actually make?

00:16:01.846 --> 00:16:08.906
Well, I have a question to ask you, right? Because I'm really fascinated in

00:16:08.906 --> 00:16:09.826
your answer to this, actually.

00:16:10.686 --> 00:16:14.786
Would Steve Jobs ever have allowed this? Wow.

00:16:16.906 --> 00:16:21.306
No, I don't think so. Nor do I. I don't think so.

00:16:21.926 --> 00:16:25.446
But i think we may have got a very blunt jobsian answer

00:16:25.446 --> 00:16:33.346
actually uh yeah and probably one that might be unpublishable um but but you

00:16:33.346 --> 00:16:39.366
know what steve and i've i i hope i don't get hate mail for this but steve existed

00:16:39.366 --> 00:16:44.666
in a different world at a different time when you didn't have the social media.

00:16:44.906 --> 00:16:53.546
You didn't have the same kind of barrage of opinions and thoughts.

00:16:53.866 --> 00:17:01.006
And they existed in a much different world of competition because until they

00:17:01.006 --> 00:17:05.306
stepped into the music industry, they really were a computer company,

00:17:05.506 --> 00:17:08.706
a technology company, a hardware company, if you will.

00:17:10.126 --> 00:17:13.886
Hardware and software okay yes i know but the the

00:17:13.886 --> 00:17:19.266
media world is a whole different animal and especially the video world and apple

00:17:19.266 --> 00:17:23.126
stepped into the music industry when it was having serious problems because

00:17:23.126 --> 00:17:28.046
of napster and he still had to have a massive row with them to convince them

00:17:28.046 --> 00:17:32.126
what he was doing was right absolutely now step it now take a look at the world

00:17:32.126 --> 00:17:33.766
that apple tv plus exists in,

00:17:33.946 --> 00:17:38.646
where you have a lot of competition, and Apple's the latecomer to the game,

00:17:39.066 --> 00:17:42.026
Apple's approach to it is quality content.

00:17:43.506 --> 00:17:47.446
And I don't know, does the world not value quality content the way it used to?

00:17:49.346 --> 00:17:56.746
I don't know, but to your point, it's an interesting question, and I don't think so.

00:17:56.886 --> 00:18:04.926
But then again, Steve was so, you know, he was known to say things no right up until he said yes.

00:18:05.986 --> 00:18:09.386
You know, hence video on the iPod. No, nobody wants to do that.

00:18:09.566 --> 00:18:13.726
Here's our video iPod. Yeah, yeah, yeah, totally.

00:18:14.746 --> 00:18:20.446
Look, it's total hypothetical sort of alternative history that we'll never sadly know the answer to.

00:18:20.566 --> 00:18:25.206
But as we were having the conversation, I was just wondering what your take

00:18:25.206 --> 00:18:30.226
on that would be, having followed Steve Jobs' Apple a lot closer than I ever had a chance to.

00:18:32.326 --> 00:18:37.006
We'll take a little left turn at the lights, and I'm going to have to dump another

00:18:37.006 --> 00:18:42.446
question on you because Apple has announced its first scripted film captured

00:18:42.446 --> 00:18:46.886
in immersive video, and they're going to be immersive films for Apple Vision Pro.

00:18:46.886 --> 00:18:50.746
Now, I haven't had a chance yet to go to an Apple store and test out a Vision Pro.

00:18:51.306 --> 00:18:55.806
You have. You were pretty enthusiastic about it when you first tested it out.

00:18:56.046 --> 00:18:59.786
I know you haven't shipped out three and a half grand to get one,

00:18:59.806 --> 00:19:01.286
so you weren't that enthusiastic.

00:19:03.366 --> 00:19:07.066
Would you – if someone gave you a Vision Pro, let's forget about buying one,

00:19:07.646 --> 00:19:10.866
would you want to settle down and watch a whole movie on it?

00:19:12.146 --> 00:19:15.106
You know, a specially designed movie? What do you think? I mean,

00:19:15.206 --> 00:19:17.666
I have to tell you, the film that's coming out is called Submerged.

00:19:17.946 --> 00:19:23.786
It looks to me about, it's a thriller based around a World War II-era submarine

00:19:23.786 --> 00:19:27.426
and the crew are dealing with harm for having been subject to an attack.

00:19:28.066 --> 00:19:33.286
I cannot think of anything I would like to do less than watch that movie as

00:19:33.286 --> 00:19:37.806
if I'm having a panic attack just discussing it with you.

00:19:40.506 --> 00:19:43.666
As a matter of principle, would you be up for this? do

00:19:43.666 --> 00:19:46.926
you know the film the abyss i don't

00:19:46.926 --> 00:19:50.026
with james james cameron okay okay

00:19:50.026 --> 00:19:52.886
it's completely underwater and i know people that

00:19:52.886 --> 00:19:55.706
have gone to see that movie and tried to hold their breaths

00:19:55.706 --> 00:19:58.506
for the entire movie because they're underwater so you're one of those

00:19:58.506 --> 00:20:01.186
that that's a right i'm i would be

00:20:01.186 --> 00:20:03.966
i'm not scared of water at all i love the sea i love

00:20:03.966 --> 00:20:10.066
swimming i'm not scared of water at all the idea of being submerged horrifies

00:20:10.066 --> 00:20:13.926
me and the idea of having a headset around me to make it feel more like i'm

00:20:13.926 --> 00:20:20.666
submerged horrifies me now that's the headset part yeah um so safe to say we

00:20:20.666 --> 00:20:23.486
will not be seeing you go to explore the titanic anytime soon.

00:20:25.805 --> 00:20:26.125
Oh,

00:20:28.165 --> 00:20:34.985
that story. Yes. To answer your question, if somebody gave it to me, yes, absolutely.

00:20:35.845 --> 00:20:40.445
And especially as I think your phrase was, especially a prepared movie like this.

00:20:41.625 --> 00:20:45.105
Designed for them. Yeah. I'm excited to get a chance to see this.

00:20:45.505 --> 00:20:47.765
And I do not have a Vision Pro headset.

00:20:48.185 --> 00:20:52.745
You're right. I have not put out the money because I have not found the use

00:20:52.745 --> 00:20:54.205
case that can justify that.

00:20:54.205 --> 00:20:59.485
Having said that, though, the entertainment factor in this thing is amazing

00:20:59.485 --> 00:21:02.945
because if you've gone and do the demo – and, okay, so, folks,

00:21:03.105 --> 00:21:07.085
just maybe skip like a minute and a half ahead if you haven't done the demo.

00:21:07.565 --> 00:21:10.145
But part of the demo puts you on a precipice.

00:21:11.705 --> 00:21:14.125
Oh, right. Thank you. Stop me doing the demo now. Perfect.

00:21:16.005 --> 00:21:18.705
But you are – I mean, you are there, okay?

00:21:19.565 --> 00:21:24.225
You can almost feel the wind blowing on your face. it is absolutely amazing

00:21:24.225 --> 00:21:28.225
and so I can only imagine that something like this,

00:21:29.045 --> 00:21:35.605
has got to be staggering if it's done the way Apple would do it and it will, you know it is,

00:21:36.885 --> 00:21:42.925
the detail the resolution, everything and the fact that all the audio is going

00:21:42.925 --> 00:21:46.805
to be right there in your ears and I think we've talked about this too before

00:21:46.805 --> 00:21:53.285
but you need one of the latest versions of AirPods to be able to put it in your ears.

00:21:53.385 --> 00:21:59.905
But the headset itself has the speakers placed so well, you really don't need those.

00:22:00.185 --> 00:22:04.625
It'll probably add to the experience, but it won't necessarily – you won't sit

00:22:04.625 --> 00:22:10.465
there and think, oh, boy, I should have gotten the AirPods. You know, I – No, no.

00:22:11.492 --> 00:22:15.152
If I recall, one of the things, another part of the demonstration that you thought

00:22:15.152 --> 00:22:18.672
was really cool was watching sport on a Vision Pro.

00:22:18.952 --> 00:22:22.252
The baseball, you even, you almost said you became a baseball fan,

00:22:22.372 --> 00:22:25.072
I think, watching on a Vision Pro.

00:22:26.292 --> 00:22:30.632
Yeah, that's overstating it a little bit. But in fact, that's overstating it

00:22:30.632 --> 00:22:33.252
a lot because I'm not sure I'll ever become a baseball fan.

00:22:33.252 --> 00:22:40.052
But I could start to understand simply because you were having much more of

00:22:40.052 --> 00:22:45.332
an experience, of like an on-field experience, the way it was presented.

00:22:46.152 --> 00:22:51.312
Right. The reason why I bring up sport is because the 2024 NBA All-Star Weekend

00:22:51.312 --> 00:22:56.212
on November the 7th is going to be, looks like it's going to be an immersive video.

00:22:57.392 --> 00:23:01.932
Wow. Which could be pretty cool. Yes. I'm sorry, it's a short film.

00:23:02.472 --> 00:23:05.392
They're going to do a short film of the nba all-star weekend oh

00:23:05.392 --> 00:23:09.552
okay well still that you know that one of

00:23:09.552 --> 00:23:12.932
the things i've some of the articles i've read about this film they were

00:23:12.932 --> 00:23:15.792
talking about the camera that it was shot with and i don't i

00:23:15.792 --> 00:23:18.692
don't want to steal anybody else's content here but i

00:23:18.692 --> 00:23:22.192
do remember i i can't remember whether i read it or listened to it on someone's

00:23:22.192 --> 00:23:28.912
podcast about the challenges of this kind of production that for for example

00:23:28.912 --> 00:23:34.052
you know with it with a vision pro you have 360 degree access so you can look

00:23:34.052 --> 00:23:38.432
upright down backside every everywhere and.

00:23:39.462 --> 00:23:43.722
The setup I have right now that you and I are talking on, I have two lights up there.

00:23:44.062 --> 00:23:48.302
So you're getting to see everything behind me. And I could even let you,

00:23:48.482 --> 00:23:53.042
if I pan the camera, I could let you see that direction. I could let you see that direction.

00:23:53.462 --> 00:23:57.742
But going that direction will completely break the illusion because then you're

00:23:57.742 --> 00:24:01.562
going to see everything that is helping me do this.

00:24:02.002 --> 00:24:07.822
How do you do that in a 360-degree production? How do you hide the lights?

00:24:08.382 --> 00:24:11.942
You know what what do you do about the gear so

00:24:11.942 --> 00:24:15.382
yes so we have there's so many different that's why

00:24:15.382 --> 00:24:18.502
we're not seeing content come immediately

00:24:18.502 --> 00:24:21.722
and this great crushing rush this is

00:24:21.722 --> 00:24:25.542
still being these are skills still being developed but to

00:24:25.542 --> 00:24:28.462
go back to the main thing here i can't

00:24:28.462 --> 00:24:32.322
wait to see this because i think this is going to be so intense and

00:24:32.322 --> 00:24:35.502
again to answer your direct question it for

00:24:35.502 --> 00:24:38.562
for for video for entertainment i think

00:24:38.562 --> 00:24:41.462
this the device is a killer app i just

00:24:41.462 --> 00:24:44.482
don't spend that much time in a

00:24:44.482 --> 00:24:48.062
dedicated entertainment mode yeah so

00:24:48.062 --> 00:24:51.062
there's a couple of other things that they're doing in immersive video i

00:24:51.062 --> 00:24:54.402
think are quite cool there's a series called elevator which is aerial travel

00:24:54.402 --> 00:24:57.822
so you know sort of amazing helicopter views

00:24:57.822 --> 00:25:01.482
and stuff i can imagine that will be stunning um to

00:25:01.482 --> 00:25:04.222
watch that immersive one that rather appeals to me

00:25:04.222 --> 00:25:07.142
is an artist called ray uh who's a six-time

00:25:07.142 --> 00:25:12.062
brit award winner she's doing it there's a capture a video of her a concert

00:25:12.062 --> 00:25:15.882
captured in immersive video uh that she's going to do this has got a 20-piece

00:25:15.882 --> 00:25:21.942
band i think that could look pretty exciting as well um again be interesting

00:25:21.942 --> 00:25:25.042
the audio quality as well so there is a lot going on with the Vision Pro.

00:25:25.102 --> 00:25:31.242
This is the first time it's really sort of wrapped up on the content side, isn't it?

00:25:31.582 --> 00:25:35.102
We haven't heard much about that. There was a lot of stuff about productivity.

00:25:36.464 --> 00:25:41.264
But there wasn't a lot of content stuff. Unless you were shooting your own,

00:25:41.824 --> 00:25:44.164
you know, like a kid's birthday party or something.

00:25:44.504 --> 00:25:50.364
So, yeah. And I think the choice of subject is very, very interesting.

00:25:50.584 --> 00:25:56.204
I wonder how much the filmmaking methodology drove this particular topic for

00:25:56.204 --> 00:25:59.524
a 17-minute video or movie or whatever.

00:26:00.564 --> 00:26:04.984
Or concert or whatever. Yeah, call it what you want. But the whole thing,

00:26:05.144 --> 00:26:06.224
I think, is just fascinating.

00:26:06.464 --> 00:26:10.684
And I feel like this is the early days of the Macintosh again.

00:26:13.324 --> 00:26:18.424
I guess it's such a cultural thing, isn't it, that we want everything done right now.

00:26:18.724 --> 00:26:21.984
No, no, no, no, no. I've got to buy the Vision Pro and it's got to have everything

00:26:21.984 --> 00:26:23.864
on end. It's got to be perfect and blah, blah, blah.

00:26:24.284 --> 00:26:28.564
And actually, this is right at the beginning. And yes, they were asking a huge

00:26:28.564 --> 00:26:30.804
amount of money for a device,

00:26:30.804 --> 00:26:34.384
but it takes time to build up a

00:26:34.384 --> 00:26:37.284
content library for a new kind of platform it

00:26:37.284 --> 00:26:41.844
takes time for people to get used to the idea i repeat to you something i said

00:26:41.844 --> 00:26:45.144
at the time when we first discussed it that for me this is still very isolating

00:26:45.144 --> 00:26:52.464
if i'm watching live sport like i like doing it with my friends and we're all

00:26:52.464 --> 00:26:54.544
talking together and seeing the same thing and watching it.

00:26:55.724 --> 00:26:59.884
I i think having a headset on is isolating but

00:26:59.884 --> 00:27:02.644
i totally get that if you're watching a movie at

00:27:02.644 --> 00:27:05.904
home by yourself or game by at home by yourself yeah i

00:27:05.904 --> 00:27:09.504
get that this could be quite a cool way to do it um i'll

00:27:09.504 --> 00:27:12.264
be interested to see how claustrophobic the experience is i really do

00:27:12.264 --> 00:27:15.264
need to go and do a a presentation and

00:27:15.264 --> 00:27:18.224
see it but um yeah it's interesting

00:27:18.224 --> 00:27:23.084
they're clearly now ramping up the content side um i

00:27:23.084 --> 00:27:26.704
want to do a plug for another show um uh two

00:27:26.704 --> 00:27:29.944
members of of my mac voices live panel marty gentius

00:27:29.944 --> 00:27:36.464
and eric bolden do a podcast called vision profiles and they have talked about

00:27:36.464 --> 00:27:42.084
in fact we've touched on the idea of getting together in a virtual environment

00:27:42.084 --> 00:27:48.144
and for with people from across the globe and watching a movie or engaging in

00:27:48.144 --> 00:27:49.504
a particular activity together.

00:27:49.864 --> 00:27:55.124
Now, it's not going to be the same as you being necessarily in the pub with

00:27:55.124 --> 00:28:01.524
your friends, but there are options there.

00:28:01.804 --> 00:28:05.744
And we've seen this tried a couple times before, long before the Vision Pro,

00:28:05.944 --> 00:28:10.244
with simultaneous viewing of a movie on one of the streaming services.

00:28:10.944 --> 00:28:18.784
So maybe it's us that need to adjust a little bit to a new type of social interaction.

00:28:20.342 --> 00:28:21.482
Oh, that's so depressing.

00:28:23.542 --> 00:28:27.562
Come on, Charlotte. No, I'm being a bit facetious. Yeah.

00:28:27.822 --> 00:28:32.142
I mean, I didn't say better. I just said different, an alternative.

00:28:32.502 --> 00:28:37.802
Yeah. I mean, all I have when we discuss this kind of thing is images of that

00:28:37.802 --> 00:28:41.522
bit and Wally, you know, where they're all sitting, watch.

00:28:43.902 --> 00:28:48.422
That's sort of where my mind goes. But do I like the idea that you and I could

00:28:48.422 --> 00:28:52.382
be watching the NBA together with these headsets on?

00:28:52.462 --> 00:28:56.002
It would be like we're in the same room chatting together. Yeah, that sounds lovely.

00:28:57.142 --> 00:29:00.782
But I don't think it could ever replace. I would much rather you were in the

00:29:00.782 --> 00:29:03.642
UK and we were watching it together. Do you see what I mean? I think.

00:29:04.542 --> 00:29:07.982
Absolutely. You know, but I'm

00:29:07.982 --> 00:29:11.022
not sure about the NBA, but I would love to watch the Masters with you.

00:29:11.522 --> 00:29:15.482
You know, and that's something we can both relate to.

00:29:15.942 --> 00:29:21.842
Um, but you know, it's not practical for you to fly over here for the masters.

00:29:22.022 --> 00:29:25.962
It's not even practical for us to get tickets to the masters because they're years long wait list.

00:29:26.142 --> 00:29:30.262
But if we could do it together right now, you know, if, if that became an option,

00:29:30.362 --> 00:29:31.162
that would be phenomenal.

00:29:32.378 --> 00:29:36.778
Yeah, I'm not being too, I don't want to be too dismissive because there are

00:29:36.778 --> 00:29:40.998
obviously lovely things that you could do with family, friends and family members.

00:29:41.138 --> 00:29:43.978
You can't, for whatever reason, can't be in the same room with you.

00:29:44.118 --> 00:29:46.718
Look, I know it from FaceTiming family members.

00:29:46.878 --> 00:29:49.958
You and I do this the whole time talking, not being in the same room.

00:29:50.058 --> 00:29:53.698
Like I'm not being dismissive, but I think I'm always nervous.

00:29:53.698 --> 00:29:57.518
As I say, I just keep thinking of that bit in Wally with the people of the people

00:29:57.518 --> 00:30:03.438
with the headsets on. And I'm just always slightly nervous of the direction

00:30:03.438 --> 00:30:07.298
we're going and how important, you know, human interaction is.

00:30:07.438 --> 00:30:13.078
But I think there is a valid point about increasing the ways you can connect with people as well.

00:30:14.138 --> 00:30:18.998
We shall see. The one thing for certain is that you and I can't steer this.

00:30:20.358 --> 00:30:24.858
We're on the train just like everybody else, and we'll see how it goes. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

00:30:24.978 --> 00:30:28.358
And the other thing for sure is that we're going to just keep discussing it on TV Plus Talk.

00:30:28.358 --> 00:30:34.698
Absolutely absolutely there's more coming from us and from apple tv plus yeah

00:30:34.698 --> 00:30:39.758
i and i uh look forward to chatting with you in just a few days time now because

00:30:39.758 --> 00:30:43.858
we're doing this show more regularly oh yeah i'm sure there'll be even more

00:30:43.858 --> 00:30:47.358
things out by then where can folks connect with you charlotte,

00:30:48.558 --> 00:30:51.838
i'm at charlotte a henry basically across

00:30:51.838 --> 00:30:54.458
social media but the best way to connect with me is head over to the

00:30:54.458 --> 00:30:57.118
edition.net check out the blog there check out

00:30:57.118 --> 00:31:01.378
extra podcast there check out the newsletter perfect perfect

00:31:01.378 --> 00:31:05.078
you can find me at macvoices.com we

00:31:05.078 --> 00:31:10.518
have a brand new website that now includes a blog and we have the live show

00:31:10.518 --> 00:31:14.718
on tuesday nights at 8 p.m eastern and we would love to have you join us at

00:31:14.718 --> 00:31:19.438
youtube.com slash macvoices tv on any of the socials you can find me as at chuck

00:31:19.438 --> 00:31:22.018
joiner charlotte we'll see you next time,

00:31:24.718 --> 00:31:25.758
See you then. Can't wait.

